Public Dashboard

What the data says — so far

Aggregated insights from participants who consented to research use. No individual responses, names, emails, or identifying details are shown. Free-text words appear only if used by multiple participants.

Data coverage
Counts only — no identifying breakdowns.
8
Total submissions

Everyone who completed the diagnostic, regardless of research consent. Withdrawn participants excluded.

7
Submissions in last 30 days

All completed diagnostics in the past 30 days.

3
Responses included in charts

Subset that consented to research use — drives every chart below.

0
Free-text words shown

Unique words meeting the ≥3 participants threshold.

Leading indicator

Impact of decisions on team productivity

Captured from follow-up surveys sent ~30 days after participants used the tool, asking how their team's productivity has been impacted by the decision mechanisms they adopted.

0
Narratives shared
Positive impact
0
No ratings yet
No change
0
No ratings yet
Negative impact
0
No ratings yet
What participants said about productivity impact

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously. Word cloud appears once 3+ participants share overlapping language.

Team & decision context

Type of decision
What type of decision is this?
Strategic · Product · Technical · Delivery · People · Risk/governance · Other

No responses yet.

Clarity / structure
How clear or structured is the decision?
Low (ambiguous) · Moderate · High (clear) · Unsure

No responses yet.

Urgency
How urgent is the decision?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Risk / consequence
How risky or consequential is the decision?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Accountability clarity
Who is clearly accountable for the outcome?
Low (broad/unclear) · Moderate · High (one clear owner) · Unsure

No responses yet.

Where expertise sits
Where does the relevant expertise sit?
Concentrated · Mixed · Distributed · Unsure
Implementation / commitment need
Who needs to act on or implement the decision?
Low (one person) · Moderate · High (wider team) · Unsure

No responses yet.

Reversibility
How reversible is the decision?
Low (hard to reverse) · Moderate · High (easy to reverse) · Unsure
Cost of broad participation
How much would broad participation cost?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure

No responses yet.

Voice / legitimacy need
What kind of voice or legitimacy is needed?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure

No responses yet.

Team type
What type of team is making this decision?
Technology · Leadership · Operations · Product · Delivery · Cross-functional · Other

No responses yet.

People involved in the decision
How many people are involved in the decision?
1–3 · 4–8 · 9–15 · 15+

No responses yet.

Team distribution
How is the team distributed?
Co-located · Hybrid · Fully remote
How decisions are made today
How are decisions currently made?
Leader decides · Consensus · Majority vote · Advice process · Delegated authority · Collaborative discussion · Unsure
Is the current approach working?
Is the current approach working well?
Working well · Mixed · Not really

How participants rated their context (1–5)

Uncertainty in the decision
How much uncertainty exists?
1 Low uncertainty → 5 High uncertainty
Team alignment
How much alignment currently exists in the team?
1 Fragmented → 5 Aligned
Psychological safety
How psychologically safe does the team feel?
1 Guarded → 5 Very safe
How much disagreement exists
How much disagreement exists?
1 Little → 5 Significant
Speed vs broad inclusion
Does the team value speed or broad inclusion more heavily?
1 Speed → 5 Broad inclusion

Most recommended mechanisms

What participants wrote (word clouds)

Free-text answers only. Stopwords removed; words appear only when used by 3+ participants.

Frustrations today
What frustrations exist today? (optional)

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously.

How they measure productivity
How does your team measure productivity?

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously.

Desired outcomes
What outcomes matter most to your team?

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously.

Generated · Ethics approval MTF.8888.2951