Decision Fit
v1.4
Public Dashboard

What the data says — so far

Aggregated insights from participants who consented to research use. No individual responses, names, emails, or identifying details are shown. Free-text words appear only if used by multiple participants.

Data coverage
Counts only — no identifying breakdowns.
11
Total submissions

Everyone who completed the diagnostic, regardless of research consent. Withdrawn participants excluded.

1
Submissions in last 30 days

All completed diagnostics in the past 30 days.

5
Responses included in charts

Subset that consented to research use — drives every chart below.

2
Free-text words shown

Unique words meeting the ≥3 participants threshold.

Self-reported follow-up

What participants reported about team productivity

Collected in follow-up surveys sent ~30 days after participants used the tool. These are unverified self-reports about the participant's own situation. They are not a measure of the tool's effectiveness, and no causal claim is made between any recommendation and the reported change.

0
Narratives shared
Self-reported: improved
0
No ratings yet
Self-reported: no change
0
No ratings yet
Self-reported: worsened
0
No ratings yet
What participants said about productivity impact

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously. Word cloud appears once 3+ participants share overlapping language.

Team & decision context

Type of decision
What type of decision is this?
Strategic · Product · Technical · Delivery · People · Risk/governance · Other
Clarity / structure
How clear or structured is the decision?
Low (ambiguous) · Moderate · High (clear) · Unsure
Urgency
How urgent is the decision?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Risk / consequence
How risky or consequential is the decision?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Accountability clarity
Who is clearly accountable for the outcome?
Low (broad/unclear) · Moderate · High (one clear owner) · Unsure
Where expertise sits
Where does the relevant expertise sit?
Concentrated · Mixed · Distributed · Unsure
Implementation / commitment need
Who needs to act on or implement the decision?
Low (one person) · Moderate · High (wider team) · Unsure
Reversibility
How reversible is the decision?
Low (hard to reverse) · Moderate · High (easy to reverse) · Unsure
Cost of broad participation
How much would broad participation cost?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Voice / legitimacy need
What kind of voice or legitimacy is needed?
Low · Moderate · High · Unsure
Team type
What type of team is making this decision?
Technology · Leadership · Operations · Product · Delivery · Cross-functional · Other
People involved in the decision
How many people are involved in the decision?
1–3 · 4–8 · 9–15 · 15+
Team distribution
How is the team distributed?
Co-located · Hybrid · Fully remote
How decisions are made today
How are decisions currently made?
Leader decides · Consensus · Majority vote · Advice process · Delegated authority · Collaborative discussion · Unsure
Is the current approach working?
Is the current approach working well?
Working well · Mixed · Not really

How participants rated their context (1–5)

Uncertainty in the decision
How much uncertainty exists?
1 Low uncertainty → 5 High uncertainty
Team alignment
How much alignment currently exists in the team?
1 Fragmented → 5 Aligned
Psychological safety
How psychologically safe does the team feel?
1 Guarded → 5 Very safe
How much disagreement exists
How much disagreement exists?
1 Little → 5 Significant
Speed vs broad inclusion
Does the team value speed or broad inclusion more heavily?
1 Speed → 5 Broad inclusion

How often each mechanism was returned

Counts of how many times each mechanism appeared in a participant's returned list under the scoring rubric in force at submission. Counts describe frequency of output only. They are not a measure of how well a mechanism works, how often it was adopted, or a weighting of any mechanism against another.

Scoring versions in this data

Each response is grouped by the scoring version the server recorded on it at submission time, not by the version running today. Point totals and participation levels are only comparable within the same version, because the collected inputs, configured points and threshold rules can differ between versions.

  • 4
    Legacy (no stored scoring version)

    Legacy responses: submitted before the server stored a scoring version. These were calculated in the browser and cannot be attributed to a specific published rubric, so they are excluded from any version-level comparison.

  • 1
    v3.0-deterministic-rubric

Stored values are deterministic outputs of researcher-authored points and ordered threshold rules. They are not probabilities, effectiveness measures, or validated predictions.

What participants wrote (word clouds)

Free-text answers only. Stopwords removed; words appear only when used by 3+ participants.

Frustrations today
What frustrations exist today? (optional)
team
How they measure productivity
How does your team measure productivity?
time
Desired outcomes
What outcomes matter most to your team?

Not enough repeated words yet to display anonymously.

Generated · Ethics approval MTF.8888.2951